.

Voters Set to Approve All Anne Arundel County Charter Amendments

Some charter amendments sailed through the polls with a 90 percent approval vote, with the lowest being 61 percent.

Anne Arundel County voters are set to ratify 15 county charter amendments by a landslide, according to early results.

All of the county's charter amendments were set to pass as of 10 p.m. Tuesday night—some with as much as 91 percent approval, and as low as 61 percent approval. But the results so far have left no room for middle ground on the issues.

Among the charter changes are removing authority from the county executive's veto rights, giving the council the authority to remove a councilman or executive convicted of a felony, and setting the month of August as a legislative recess for the seven-member council.

A few of the tighter races are yet to be determined, but Anne Arundel County residents can rest tonight on pretty solid ground that the county's charter will be changed in 15 different ways.

The 15 charter amendments are:

Question A—Gives county departments more time to file their budgets. It also moves the start of the 60-day window for budget deliberation by the County Council from April 15 to May 1. It does not change the budget deadline. (Resolution 54-12)

Question B—Allows the County Council to remove the county executive from office if the official is convicted of, or pleads no contest to, a felony charge, or a crime of moral turpitude or malfeasance. It requires five of the seven council members to vote in favor of it. (Resolution 32-12)

Question C—Same as Question B, only for a county councilmember. (Resolution 33-12)

Question D—Allows State Central Committee to fill a County Council vacancy if the council cannot decide within 30 days. (Resolution 45-12)

Question E—Creates a separate fund to be used explicitly to accrue employee retiree healthcare benefits. As it stands, these funds are taken from the county's general fund, which waxes and wanes along with other expenditures. (Resolution 34-12)

Question F—Would restrict the power of the county executive's veto rights to comprehensive rezoning items only. As it stands, the executive can remove individual provisions from any council legislation. (Resolution 47-12)

Question G—Changes the start of a county councilmember's term from the day after a successful election bid to the first Monday in December following an election. (Resolution 48-12)

Question H—Gives County Council members the month of August off from their regular meetings. They would still perform their elected duties, but would not meet to vote on legislation for August. (Resolution 40-12)

Question I—Requires an annual, third-party audit of the county government. This is what has been practiced in recent years, but the current charter only requires an audit every four years. (Resolution 38-12)

Question J—The change would require that any money gained by the county from the sale of bonds would be spent exclusively on capital improvement projects. (Resolution 50-12)

Question K— Expands the number of members on the county's Charter Review Commission from five to seven, giving each councilman one appointment each. (Resolution 35-12)

Question L—Limits the county's Board of Appeals members to serve a maximum of two consecutive four-year terms. (Resolution 35-12)

Question M—Same as Question L, only for the county's Ethics Commission. (Resolution 49-12)

Question N—Clarifies that if the county executive leaves a bill unsigned, or unvetoed, the bill is automatically approved 10 days after the executive was presented it. (Resolution 39-12)

Question O—Allows the county executive to distribute electronic copies of the  budget. The current charter requires paper copies to be sent to all council members. Welcome to the 21st century. (Resolution 55-12)

See also: Ballot Homework: 15 County Charter Changes You Will Help Decide

Lynn Scherer Swager November 07, 2012 at 05:24 PM
THIS COUNTY IS GOING TO HELL IN A HANDBASKET....BUT NOT BY MY HAND...DON'T COMPLAIN WHENEVER YOU ARE TOLD THERE IS NOT MORE MONEY FOR HIRING ACADEMIC TEACHERS BECAUSE THEY RAIDED THE EDUCATION FUND....OR THEY ARE HIRING SOME 'PERSON' TO TEACH GAY AND LESBIAN FOREPLAY IN THE CLASSROOM...IT WILL HAPPEN...GUARANTEED!!!
Ken November 07, 2012 at 08:28 PM
It's been while since I had SexEd in school, but is there a 'person' in the classroom that currently teaches foreplay for straight individuals?
Steven Conn November 07, 2012 at 08:52 PM
Your intolerance for freedoms are on par with those of the Taliban. You're a perfect match: the Taliban also hates anyone who disagrees with their religious beliefs. Fortunately the U.S. isn't governed by religious extremists and I understand your frustration of not quite fitting in here... may I offer you an economy class one way ticket to Afghanistan / Iran / Pakistan. Don't forget your sunscreen and burkha.
Mike H November 07, 2012 at 10:24 PM
I don't even know where to start. 1. Turn your caps lock off. If you can't emphasize a point without caps, then you don't deserve to post. 2. Don't be salty because you lost on an issue. Grow up, you are in the minority on a certain issue, that is why we vote. At this time you do not get your way, be an adult and suck it up. 3. If they start teaching lesbian foreplay in school, I'm going back. 4. What you describe as "hell in a hand basket" others would describe as progress, 50 years ago people were saying the same things about black civil rights. If gays and lesbians can find someone who they actually want to spend their lives with, why shouldn't they get married?.. And if you say "becuase God..." then you are a moron and do not understand the separation of church and state. In conclusion, you are kind of a bigot, and I hope you have the good fortune of eventual enlightenment.
Tom November 07, 2012 at 11:13 PM
I'm upset at all the election results, But at least my vote for Question O -electronic copies of the budget passed.. I would have been royally pissed if that one went down. Fool us once, shame on them. Fool us twice, shame on Us.
Tom November 07, 2012 at 11:15 PM
@Ken, Stay here in Md. and it may be on the ballot in 2014.
Ken November 08, 2012 at 02:47 PM
@Tom: I've no plans on leaving and am fortunate to be in a state where logical thinkers outnumber delusional thinkers. It's entertaining to watch message boards and forums with people boasting of "successful" petition drives for a referendum and I'm sure you'll disagree, but the results reflect progess in a civil society.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something