This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Politics & Government

State Legislators Consider Overturning Pit Bull Ruling

Thursday's special session of the General Assembly also will include a bill to reverse a court's ruling that pit bulls are inherently dangerous.

Maryland's legislators won't just be talking about gambling when they return to Annapolis this week.

Lawmakers also will take up a bill to overturn April's court decision that all pit bulls are inherently dangerous.

According to a story in The Baltimore Sun, Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee Chairman Brian Frosh circulated a draft bill on Monday that would make all dog owners legally responsible for bites regardless of breed.

Find out what's happening in Broadneckwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

"We actually think that the legislative session is great," said Kim Teter, volunteer coordinator for the SPCA of Anne Arundel County. "We are glad we could get it now rather than having to wait until January."

The bill is in response to a controversial ruling by the Maryland Court of Appeals this April. It stated that pit bull owners would face more liability in attack cases than owners of other breeds.

Find out what's happening in Broadneckwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

"When an attack involves pit bulls, it is no longer necessary to prove that the particular pit bull or pit bulls are dangerous," Judge Dale R. Cathell wrote in the opinion.

The ruling also extended that liability to landlords and granted property owners permission to prohibit pit bulls or pit bull crossbreeds from their properties.

Michael Kocher of Arnold fosters pit bulls with his wife Asa. . Kocher said overturning the ruling is simply common sense.

"I can't believe such a ruling was handed down in the first place," Kocher said. "There's no such thing as an 'inherently dangerous' dog. They have to be trained (and abused) by a human being in order to become the deranged killer that is all too often associated with the term 'pit bull.'"

Teter said the court decision caused a real problem at her shelter in Annapolis where more than a quarter of the dogs up for adoption appear to be pit bull or pit bull mixes.

"We have a number of pit bulls here that keep getting overlooked," Teter said. "Landlords are now afraid to have them, and many insurance companies won't let you have them either."

She said a lot of people who come into adopt tell her apartment complexes are denying dogs if "it looks like a pit bull."

"We make the best assumption that we can based on our knowledge, but it's very hard to identify a breed based on looks," Teter said. "We simply can't make this designation definitively by looks."

Teter said she fears if the ruling stands, landlords could begin blanket prohibitions on animals in general.

In May, Marylanders flocked to Annapolis  at Lawyer's Mall. And they will be back this week to in support of the bill to overturn the court's ruling.

Teter said a rally is being organized for Thursday by B-More Dog, a Baltimore County-based nonprofit group. Specific details on the time and location of the rally have not yet been released.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?

More from Broadneck